Comments: Bush Strategy of Retreat

Weak, dude... totally weak.

Posted by Chris Elam at October 7, 2004 02:08 AM

When does a plan equal a strategy? I have house plans they are not strategic in nature. Come on college guys, you gota do better than this.

Still looking back at ya

Posted by peter at October 7, 2004 08:10 AM

There's a difference between changing your mind ONCE and changing your mind over and over and over to fit with whatever the polls tell you to think.

Posted by Drew at October 7, 2004 08:16 AM

To continue, maybe like Sen. Edwards did constantly on Tuesday, your empression from the quotes you're quoting maybe the difference between a Yale grad, Harvard Masters grad and a UT student.

Come back when you got something better.

Posted by peter at October 7, 2004 08:16 AM

Yeah, you're right peter - Shrub was rejected from UT. We have higher standards here.

Posted by Byron L at October 7, 2004 12:52 PM

Better than where Kerry and Clinton, Hillary and Bill graduated from? I guess they were deficient too. Such lowlife, those Ivy Schools. I guess ALGORE didn't meet UT's standards either.

Well lets take score; three off your last nominees wouldn't make it at UT.

Three President's in a row from Yale. And if you have your way it will be four. Your last grad was in the 30's. Your father wasn't even born yet.

The fourth one will not make it.

Looking back at ya

Posted by peter at October 7, 2004 02:45 PM

Does victory always look this bad, before it gets better?

Posted by sam sandoval jr at October 7, 2004 02:49 PM

1862/1942 Battle of the Coral Sea/Midway, sure does.

Posted by peter at October 7, 2004 03:09 PM

I agree Drew. Bush changes his position over and over. Can you explain to me why?

Posted by Byron L at October 7, 2004 03:17 PM

OK, Byron, let me clarify myself, because, obviously, I wasn't very clear.

When you take a stance, and then realize you are wrong, and change that stance, that's not flip-flopping. Bush realized he was wrong on the 9/11 commission, and changed his mind. Bush realized he was wrong on the Department of Homeland Security, and changed his mind.
Not to mention that saying that he wanted Osama bin Laden dead or alive, and then saying that there were other things to worry about does not mean that he's not still a priority. Besides, at this point, if he was found, wouldn't the Democrats start claiming that it was politically motivated??

On the other hand, Kerry says he's for the war, and then, when Dean starts to win in Iowa, he's against the war. Then, when he has to win moderate votes, he's for it again. The difference is that Kerry is changing his stance constantly on THE SAME ISSUE.

Posted by Drew at October 7, 2004 04:13 PM

Keep up the good work Drew! ;)

Posted by peter at October 7, 2004 04:22 PM
Post a comment









Remember personal info?