I think the only question now is if "the redistricting effort in Texas," qualifies as funding a state legislative campaign. If so, it'w a major no-no under the Texas constitution.

Delay sought "a combination of corporate and personal money." It looks like he did this to hide the money trail so he could argue later that only "personal" money was used in the frontline redistricting effort, and that the "corporate" money was used for administrative expenses. How well he laundered the corporate money will determine whether or not he is indicted.

And does this surprise anyone?

I read the entire article and all I have to say is "if it walks like a duck and quacks like a duck - it's a duck"!!!!!! But DeLay will go to his grave trying to convince everyone that all that waddling and quacking is the sound of a chicken.