![]() |
![]() |
Burnt Orange ReportNews, Politics, and Fun From Deep in the Heart of Texas |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
March 08, 2005Rick Perry Attacks Blogs AgainBy Byron LaMastersRick Perry really doesn't get blogs. For the second time in just over a year, Governor Perry has gone to the Austin American Statesman attacking the blogosphere. This time, Perry's victim was In the Pink, Texas. Here's what Perry's spokesman said this time:
Most blogs are run with a "severe liberal bent"? That's completely laughable. I guess that the governor has never heard of Instapundit, Powerline Blog or Little Green Footballs. And even if we just look at Texas blogs, I guess that the governor has never heard of Beldar Blog, the Lone Star Times, BlogHouston or Safety for Dummies. When I mentioned this to the reporter, Gardner Selby, he said that Governor Perry mentioned that there were no conservative/Republican blogs specifically referring to capitol politics, while there are numerous Democratic and left-leaning blogs at the capitol. I have a very simple solution, governor... there are 19 Republican State Senators and 87 Republican State Representatives. They all have a lot of staffers that could easily start blogs to cover the legislative session. Why don't they join the Democratic representative (Aaron Pena) and staffers that have started blogs this session? It's quite easy. As for the "controversy" that prompted this article - I'm perplexed that the governor would find it necessary to speak to the press on the matter. The "controversy" - only seen by several hundred people until now, will be seen by thousands in the newspaper today. These types of stories just go away unless fuel is added to the fire. Going to the mainstream media does just that. I'm rather pleased with the quote of mine that got printed:
I believe that blogs are just as accountable to their audience as any other media source. In fact, I would argue that blogs are in many ways more accountable to their readers than newspapers, and other traditional media. Blogs provide instant two-way communication. If a reader believes that something that we write is biased, unfair or incorrect, that reader can post a comment instantly communicating to the writer and all readers their opinion. Newspapers only provide corrections in later editions, and only print a small fraction of the letters to the editor in which they receive. Bloggers, on the other hand, publish nearly all non-spam comments to their posts. There are arguments that blogs aren't accountable. For example, most of us don't have editors, and anyone can start a blog and write whatever they want. However, as blogs have grown as a major news medium, institutional checks-and-balances systems have emerged. If a blog is not creditable, other bloggers won't link to it. If a blog is not creditable, readers will stop visiting it. If a blog is not creditable, advertisers will not advertise on it. Not all blogs are creditable, but the nature of two-way communication that blogs provide, allow for a checks-and-balances system that separates the creditable blogs from the non-creditable blogs. So, my advice to Rick Perry? Stop whining and set up your own damn blog! Posted by Byron LaMasters at March 8, 2005 07:39 AM | TrackBack
Comments
And boy, if people don't like what you post, or believe it is overly biased, or incorrect, they usually will call you out on your shit. It's been refreshing to get that kind of feedback personally in regards to a couple of my Student Government related posts (by comments or e-mails) and it is true that you tend to adjust to that criticism. If it is unfounded, you don't have to change, but if it is based in real concerns, you cannot ignore it and expect to continue to be taken seriously. If you lose your credibility as a blogger, you lose your greatest asset. That goes for the MSM as well. Posted by: Karl-T at March 8, 2005 06:03 AMBut Mr. Perry - - The other side has Rush Limbaugh and Darryl Ankarlo. Posted by: Tom Blackwell at March 8, 2005 06:26 AMThe governor's staff just turned a story that was circulating on a few partisan blogs into a "real" story. That certainly wasn't pretty to watch for this conservative leaning blogger. Ah well. Thanks for the mention of blogHOUSTON, even if it isn't really about state politics or partisan politics per se. One comment on this point: I believe that blogs are just as accountable to their audience as any other media source. In fact, I would argue that blogs are in many ways more accountable to their readers than newspapers, and other traditional media. Blogs provide instant two-way communication. If a reader believes that something that we write is biased, unfair or incorrect, that reader can post a comment instantly communicating to the writer and all readers their opinion. Newspapers only provide corrections in later editions, and only print a small fraction of the letters to the editor in which they receive. Bloggers, on the other hand, publish nearly all non-spam comments to their posts. I certainly share your frustration with newspaper corrections. The Chronicle has a really bad habit of printing those corrections later, and then whitewashing the original online story (no indication it was corrected). That's infuriating. On the other hand, I think we as bloggers do have to be careful in thinking our audience will always provide corrective. Many bloggers do have loyal audiences, and I would suggest that sometimes ideological loyalty may slow the corrective process (sometimes, I'd suggest, readers are reading what they want to believe). I think that sort of blindness is rare among quality blogs, but I do think it happens from time to time. The better blogs, of course, tend to have a diverse readership (whatever the blog's partisan orientation), and in that case, I think the process usually works as you describe. Posted by: kevin whited at March 8, 2005 08:12 AMI thought Hugh Hewitt thought blogs were the best thing since sliced peanut butter... err, something. Posted by: Jim D at March 8, 2005 08:25 AMI was waiting by my phone ALL DAY yesterday for Perry flack Robert Black to call me so we could discuss, mano a mano, any errors he was referring to. (I felt like it was high school all over again and I was waiting in vain for that dreamy upperclassman to invite me to the prom.) He never called. (Neither did the senior.) And, Kevin, in response to your comment, I don't write a "partisan" blog - I'm not on anyone's payroll and I take shots at absolutely everyone. Perry gets more shots than other people because he's, you know, The Governor. That wouldn't be the first questionable thing a Perry staffer ever said. Posted by: betapundit at March 8, 2005 09:54 AMAlong with the article in New York Metro in which Kurt Andersen attacks blogs", there seems to be this sudden interest in the "accuracy" of blogs. It seems to me, that this interest is fueled, no so much by the accuracy aspect, as much as the media, and by extension politicians, such as Perry, losing control over the message. Bloggers can take the words of a journalist or politican, and provide a (not always accurate) analysis. Those bloggers who are regularly off the mark, or just plain "out there" get ignored. Those who are right get attention paid. Bloggers need the media, to provide the fodder for their blogs, so contrary to Kurt Andersen, neither will be made redundant by the other. Politicians on the other hand, require the media (preferrably a compliant media), and don't want this uncontrollable group of people, who are only answerable to their readers, and not to the politicians who feed them information, or the corporate interests who write their checks. Posted by: David (Austin Tx) at March 8, 2005 11:54 AMInteresting thought, David. I agree, pols and the MSM reject blogs because they cannot control the message. However, I would also argue that there is a line of decency to which the MSM is bound, but which blogs can skirt. (Making so big a deal of "Jeff Gannon's" extracurricular activities, for example.) It may be that the more "fringe" blogs are the most frequent interlopers but all blogs have the same potential. They are accountable only to those who read them, which tends (as said above, I believe) to be more and more "loyalists." Blogs then would seem to cater to these readers at all costs and stories that, perhaps, should be handled with kid gloves (if not remain out of public exposure entirely), are blown up for a ravenous audience clamoring for blood and not willing to see any punches pulled. Posted by: TAMU Andy at March 8, 2005 12:21 PMTAMU Andy, I accept your premise to a point. The problem where it begins to break down, is when you look at the yellow journalism of the Clinton years. It seemed that nothing really, was off limits for reporting. By both the MSM, and in other forums. The sense of decorum that seems to be the current norm, did not exist as few as 6 years ago. Maybe there has been a bit of introspection on the part of the media, reviewing the feeding frenzy of the 90's but I don't know that it is entirely that. Posted by: David (Austin Tx) at March 8, 2005 12:49 PMIn a lot of ways, you guys are right about the self-corrective nature of blogs, and wrong about loyalists and such. Most bloggers (I would think) along with myself, started blogging for one reason, myself. I wanted a place where I could just state my opinion. If I had a million daily readers or 5, I would still write the same things. I write about what interests me, and let people who find the same thing interesting find me and read me. The idea that I might "cater" to anyone just seems silly. And since I'm writing for myself, I take a great amount of pride in the fact that I take enough time to do a simple google search and find a source for a quote or for CBO numbers or for anything else. That's basic journalism and basic common sense (a clever reference to my own blog. I make it real easy for people to find me and read me). That's it for now. There's a lot more to this discussion, but this is just a comment to be elaborated on later perhaps. Posted by: Nate at March 8, 2005 07:59 PMComments elaborated. Posted by: Nate at March 8, 2005 08:34 PMWhat an interesting post Byron--one of your best. Now if you will more consistently practice what you are preaching it will be refreshing. But, Karl you got some splainin to do--you state in the response to this post, "If you lose your credibility as a blogger, you lose your greatest asset. That goes for the MSM as well." Yet, just the other day, when I was critical of Byron for being too biased, you posted this comment aimed directly at my criticism, "I don't really feel that as bloggers we have much a 'reputation' to fulfill, certainly not some standard of the Washington Post or such. If you don't like reading opinion driven commentary, then don't read it, and certainly don't bitch about it. Pick up a newspaper then. But if you don't feel that the newspapers are covering your little shindig right (or at all) then start up your own little press shop instead of attacking other writers. I don't pretend to believe that everything I'm reading on blogs about meetings and events isn't slanted in some way. We try our best but by no means are there any requirements in place." Hmm. Looks to me like you are trying to have it both ways. So which way is it Karl? Posted by: Pete at March 8, 2005 09:41 PMCheck out "Blogged Down" from The American Prospect. From the lead: "Pseudo-journalistic Web sites are another way conservatives get around “the filter” of mainstream media. It’s a new medium, but, for the Republican Party, it’s an old story." I must have missed the part where Perry "attacked" blogs. Posted by: Gringo Salado at March 10, 2005 05:21 PM
Post a comment
|
![]() |
About Us
About/Contact
Advertising Policies
Donate
![]()
Archives
May 2005
April 2005 March 2005 February 2005 January 2005 December 2004 November 2004 October 2004 September 2004 August 2004 July 2004 June 2004 May 2004 April 2004 March 2004 February 2004 January 2004 December 2003 November 2003 October 2003 September 2003 August 2003 July 2003 June 2003
Recent Entries
Nebraska Gay Marriage Amendment Overturned
Military Musical Chairs Update Firefox Texas Democratic Party: $6,300 Making Homes Nuclear Text Messages DeLay and Frist: Out of Control Chris Bell Liveblog Parental Consent Bill Tabled Done Take the Pew Test Team Musselman Kuffner Interviews Lampson Sessions to support Bonilla for Senate? Rick Perry Has New Polling Numbers! Conservatives Finally Coming Around on Marijuana Decriminalization? Well boys, I reckon this is it -- nukyular combat, toe to toe with the GOP This Headline Cannot Contain My Boiling Rage Constructive Media Criticism University Democrats Endorse Jennifer Kim
Categories
2004: Dem Convention (79)
2004: Presidential Election (570) 2008: Presidential Election (8) About Burnt Orange (126) Around Campus (144) Austin City Limits (140) Axis of Idiots (29) Blogs and Blogging (134) BOR Humor (63) BOR Sports (59) Budget (16) Burnt Orange Endorsements (14) Congress (41) Crime and Punishment (2) Dallas City Limits (100) Elsewhere in Texas (14) Get into the Action! (5) GLBT (150) Houston City Limits (29) International (96) Intraparty (39) National Politics (497) Oh, you know, other stuff. (30) Politics for Dummies (11) Pop Culture (63) Redistricting (255) Social Security (30) Texas Lege (113) Texas Politics (681) That Liberal Media (2) The Economy, Stupid (15) The Stars At Night Are Big And Bright (1)
BOR Edu.
University of Texas
University Democrats
BOR News
The Daily Texan
The Statesman The Chronicle
BOR Politics
DNC
DNC Blog: Kicking Ass DSCC DSCC Blog: From the Roots DCCC DCCC Blog: The Stakeholder Texas Dems Travis County Dems U.S. Rep. Lloyd Doggett State Sen. Gonzalo Barrientos State Rep. Dawnna Dukes State Rep. Elliott Naishtat State Rep. Eddie Rodriguez State Rep. Mark Strama
Linked to BOR!
Alexa Rating
Truth Laid Bear Ecosystem Technoranti Link Cosmos Blogstreet Blogback
Polling
American Research Group
Annenberg Election Survey Gallup Polling Report Rasmussen Reports Survey USA Zogby
Texas Stuff
A Little Pollyana
Austin Bloggers DFW Bogs DMN Blog In the Pink Texas Inside the Texas Capitol The Lasso Pol State TX Archives Quorum Report Daily Buzz George Strong Political Analysis Texas Law Blog Texas Monthly Texas Observer
TX Dem Blogs
100 Monkeys Typing
Alandwilliams.com Alt 7 Annatopia Appalachia Alumni Association Barefoot and Naked BAN News Betamax Guillotine Blue Texas Border Ass News The Daily DeLay The Daily Texican Dos Centavos Drive Democracy Easter Lemming Esoterically Get Donkey Greg's Opinion Half the Sins of Mankind Jim Hightower Houtopia Hugo Zoom Latinos for Texas Off the Kuff Ones and Zeros Panhandle Truth Squad Aaron Peña's Blog People's Republic of Seabrook Pink Dome The Red State Rhetoric & Rhythm Rio Grande Valley Politics Save Texas Reps Skeptical Notion Something's Got to Break Southpaw Stout Dem Blog The Scarlet Left Tex Prodigy ToT View From the Left Yellow Doggeral Democrat
TX GOP Blogs
Beldar Blog
Blogs of War Boots and Sabers Dallas Arena Jessica's Well Lone Star Times Publius TX Safety for Dummies The Sake of Arguement Slightly Rough
Daily Reads
&c.
ABC's The Note Atrios BOP News Daily Kos Media Matters MyDD NBC's First Read Political State Report Political Animal Political Wire Talking Points Memo CBS Washington Wrap Wonkette Matthew Yglesias
College Blogs
CDA Blog
Get More Ass (Brown) Dem Apples (Harvard) KU Dems U-Delaware Dems UNO Dems Stanford Dems
GLBT Blogs
American Blog
BlogActive Boi From Troy Margaret Cho Downtown Lad Gay Patriot Raw Story Stonewall Dems Andrew Sullivan
More Reads
Living Indefinitely
Blogroll Burnt Orange!
BOR Webrings
< ? Texas Blogs # >
<< ? austinbloggers # >> « ? MT blog # » « ? MT # » « ? Verbosity # »
Election Returns
CNN 1998 Returns
CNN 2000 Returns CNN 2002 Returns CNN 2004 Returns state elections 1992-2005 bexar county elections collin county elections dallas county elections denton county elections el paso county elections fort bend county elections galveston county elections harris county elections jefferson county elections tarrant county elections travis county elections
Texas Media
abilene
abilene reporter news alpine alpine avalanche amarillo amarillo globe news austin austin american statesman austin chronicle daily texan online keye news (cbs) kut (npr) kvue news (abc) kxan news (nbc) news 8 austin beaumont beaumont enterprise brownsville brownsville herald college station the battalion (texas a&m) corpus christi corpus christi caller times kris news (fox) kztv news (cbs) crawford crawford lone star iconoclast dallas-fort worth dallas morning news dallas observer dallas voice fort worth star-telegram kdfw news (fox) kera (npr) ktvt news (cbs) nbc5 news wfaa news (abc) del rio del rio news herald el paso el paso times kdbc news (cbs) kfox news (fox) ktsm (nbc) kvia news (abc) galveston galveston county daily news harlingen valley morning star houston houston chronicle houston press khou news (cbs) kprc news (nbc) ktrk news (abc) laredo laredo morning times lockhart lockhart post-register lubbock lubbock avalanche journal lufkin lufkin daily news marshall marshall news messenger mcallen the monitor midland - odessa midland reporter telegram odessa american san antonio san antonio express-news seguin seguin gazette-enterprise texarkana texarkana gazette tyler tyler morning telegraph victoria victoria advocate waco kxxv news (abc) kwtx news (cbs) waco tribune-herald weslaco krgv news (nbc) statewide texas cable news texas triangle
World News
ABC News All Africa News Arab News Atlanta Constitution-Journal News.com Australia BBC News Bloomberg Boston Globe CBS News Chicago Tribune Christian Science Monitor CNN Denver Post FOX News Google News The Guardian Inside China Today International Herald Tribune Japan Times LA Times Mexico Daily Miami Herald MSNBC New Orleans Times-Picayune New York Times El Pais (Spanish) Salon San Francisco Chronicle Seattle Post-Intelligencer Slate Times of India Toronto Star Wall Street Journal Washington Post
Powered by
Movable Type 3.15 |
![]() |